Theodore Griffin v. Martin County, et al
| THEODORE KEITH GRIFFIN |
| MARTIN COUNTY, WILLIAM D. SNYDER, BRANDON GREIS, EDWARD LEO BROCHU, DANIEL FOOTE, CASTORO, JUSTIN LUNDSTEDT, KITRICK DOWNHAM, ISMAEL HAU, CHEREEL TOLLEY and DANIEL CUNNINGHAM |
| 24-10256 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Theodore Keith Griffin. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 02/16/2024 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 02/13/2024. Docket Entry 27. [Entered: 02/16/2024 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Theodore Keith Griffin. CIP forwarded from another court. See FRAP 25(a)(1). [Entered: 02/16/2024 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Theodore Keith Griffin. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Theodore Keith Griffin on 01/22/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 01/26/2024 05:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
