Emilio Santiago v. USA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
EMILIO SANTIAGO |
24-10272 |
January 25, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Response to Jurisdictional Question with incorporated motion for leave to file Jurisdictional Response out of time filed by Appellant Emilio Santiago. [Entered: 03/22/2024 04:33 PM] |
Filing 12 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Emilio Santiago was filed on 03/04/2024. Docket Entry 37. [Entered: 03/18/2024 01:44 PM] |
Filing 10 Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellee USA [24-10272] (ECF: Laura Rivero) [Entered: 03/01/2024 11:42 AM] |
Filing 9 AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Laura Thomas Rivero for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10272] (ECF: Laura Rivero) [Entered: 03/01/2024 11:34 AM] |
Filing 11 Notice of receipt: Request for docket sheet as to Appellant Emilio Santiago.. [Entered: 03/01/2024 03:19 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Laura Thomas Rivero for USA Related cases? No. [24-10272] (ECF: Laura Rivero) [Entered: 02/22/2024 09:37 AM] |
Filing 7 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Emilio Santiago and USA. [Entered: 02/20/2024 03:34 PM] |
Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Emilio Santiago. [Entered: 02/13/2024 11:38 AM] |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Matzkin for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10272] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 02/05/2024 03:26 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [24-10272] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 01/31/2024 09:01 AM] |
Filing 3 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Emilio Santiago was filed on 11/08/2023. Docket Entry 25. [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:24 PM] |
Filing 2 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Emilio Santiago on 01/24/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Emilio Santiago v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: EMILIO SANTIAGO | |
Represented By: | Emilio Santiago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Daniel Matzkin |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
Represented By: | Laura Thomas Rivero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.