Kenneth Doctor v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
| KENNETH DOCTOR |
| SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-10280 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Kenneth Doctor v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Judgment entered as to Appellant Kenneth Doctor. [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:57 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Kenneth Doctor. Decision: Dismissed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Kenneth Doctor because the appeal was erroneously dismissed on 03/18/2024. . [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:19 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RECALLED (See 3/20/24 Entry)***ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.; Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Kenneth Doctor is DENIED as MOOT. Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Kenneth Doctor is DENIED as MOOT. (See attached order for complete text)[Edited 03/20/2024 by RAV] [Entered: 03/18/2024 02:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to proceed IFP, for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Kenneth Doctor. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 02/29/2024 11:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kenneth Doctor. [Entered: 02/29/2024 11:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 02/27/2024 04:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Kenneth Doctor. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 02/22/2024 04:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Kenneth Doctor. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 02/22/2024 04:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Kenneth Doctor was filed on 09/13/2023. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:41 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kenneth Doctor on 01/22/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:38 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
