USA v. Camilo Vargas
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CAMILO ANDRES LANDAZUI VARGAS |
| 24-10348 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [24-10348] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 02/06/2024 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Camilo Andres Landazui Vargas on 02/02/2024. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 02/05/2024 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Camilo Vargas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: CAMILO ANDRES LANDAZUI VARGAS | |
| Represented By: | Camilo Andres Landazui Vargas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
