Isaac Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
Petitioner: ISAAC BROWN
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 24-10491
Filed: February 15, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2024 Filing 7 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for appointment of counsel [ # 6 ], Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant Isaac Brown. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. Additionally, the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 04/03/2024 11:36 AM]
April 2, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for appointment of counsel, for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Isaac Brown. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 04/03/2024 11:35 AM]
March 26, 2024 Filing 5 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to compel [ # 4 ] filed by Appellant Isaac Brown in 24-10405, 24-10491. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed.. [24-10405, 24-10491] [Entered: 03/26/2024 02:53 PM]
March 18, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION to compel filed by Appellant Isaac Brown in 24-10405, 24-10491. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [24-10405, 24-10491] [Entered: 03/26/2024 02:52 PM]
March 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Isaac Brown failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:41 PM]
March 12, 2024 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Isaac Brown was filed on 03/11/2024. Docket Entry 43. [Entered: 03/12/2024 07:47 AM]
February 15, 2024 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Isaac Brown on 02/02/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 02/21/2024 02:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Isaac Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ISAAC BROWN
Represented By: Isaac Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?