In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, et al
| In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC and SAMARK LOPEZ BELLO |
| CARLOS EDUARDO MARRON, JANE DOE, C.R., A Minor, S.A., A Minor, NICOLAS MADURO MOROS, FUERZAS ARMADAS REVOLUCIONARIOS DE COLOMBIA, a.k.a. FARC a.k.a. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, CARTEL OF THE SUNS, a.k.a. Cartel De Los Soles, VLADIMIR PADRINO LOPEZ, MAIKEL JOSE MORENO PEREZ, NESTOR LUIS REVEROL TORRES, TAREK WILLIAM SAAB and TARECK EL AISSAMI |
| SERVICE |
| 24-10503 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Appellate fee was paid on 02/20/2024 as to Petitioners 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC, 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC and Samark Lopez Bello. [Entered: 02/22/2024 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Attorney Adam Seth Fels for Petitioner Samark Lopez Bello in 24-10503, Attorney Adam Seth Fels for Petitioner 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC in 24-10503, Attorney Adam Seth Fels for Petitioner 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC in 24-10503. [Entered: 02/22/2024 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 Exhibits 1-20 Document filed by 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC, 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC and Samark Lopez Bello in support of Motion for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC and Samark Lopez Bello in 24-10503 [ # 1 ]. [Entered: 02/22/2024 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioners 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC, 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC and Samark Lopez Bello. Fee Status: Fee Paid [Entered: 02/22/2024 01:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
