David Sussman v. Shevaun Harris, et al
| DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, a.k.a. El Maestro |
| SHEVAUN HARRIS, in their official capacity, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, (hereinafter Wellpath), DONALD SAWYER, Corporate Vice President at Wellpath, supra., JON CARNER, Facility Administrator at FCCC, supra., MELINDA MASTERS, Former Fac. Admin. at FCCC, supra., SERENA WILLIAMS, Asst. Fac. Admin. at FCCC, supra., CYNTHIA NOBLETT, Business Administrator at FCCC, supra., LAVON CARDENAS, Legal Assistant at FCCC, supra., DOTTY RIDDLER, Legal Assistant at FCCC, supra. and PATRICIA SHAW, Asst. Business Admin. at FCCC, supra. |
| 24-10565 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Detainee - Conditions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received in the district court or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 04/10/2024 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 16 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for PDF or Paper Copy of Doc. No. 30-1[ # 15 ] filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s):.the document requested is not reflected on this Court's docket. [Entered: 04/10/2024 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party David Charles Sussman. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 04/09/2024 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 13 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman. [Entered: 04/09/2024 05:17 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Motion toRemedy Default Transcript Order Form and Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman is GRANTED by clerk [ # 11 ]. [Entered: 04/09/2024 05:14 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to file Trancript Order Form and Certificate of Interested Persons out of time filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 04/09/2024 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 10 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension to file appellant brief [ # 9 ] filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s):. A briefing schedule has not been issued. [Entered: 04/02/2024 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION for PDF or Paper Copy of Doc. No. 30-1 filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [15] [Entered: 04/10/2024 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time to file appellants brief to 04/12/2024 filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 04/02/2024 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notice of receipt: Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement and Transcript Order Form as to Appellant David Charles Sussman. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN A motion to remedy the default(s) has not been filed. See 11th Cir. Rules 42-1(b), 42-2(e), and 42-3(e)... [Entered: 03/27/2024 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to consolidate appeals 24-10565 filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman in 24-10442, 24-10565. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [24-10442, 24-10565] [Entered: 03/21/2024 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant David Charles Sussman. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 03/19/2024 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to David Charles Sussman. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 03/19/2024 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 03/04/2024 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant David Charles Sussman was filed on 03/04/2024. Docket Entry 55. [Entered: 03/04/2024 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant David Charles Sussman was filed on 02/20/2024. Docket Entry 51. [Entered: 02/27/2024 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Charles Sussman on 02/20/2024. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/18/2024 as to Appellant David Charles Sussman [Entered: 02/27/2024 02:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
