Supreme Born v. Randall Woodfin, et al
| SUPREME BORN |
| RANDALL WOODFIN, PATRICK SMITH, JOYLYN GRAIG, MICHAEL T ANDERTON, KANDICE PICKETT, SHANNON O'GUIN, JESSICA JONES HEBSON, LESLIE SCHIFFMAN MOORE, VENITTA LEE and MICHAEL T. ANDERTON |
| 24-10581 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Supreme Born. [Entered: 04/17/2024 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Supreme Born. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 04/17/2024 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 04/11/2024. Docket Entry 47. [Entered: 04/12/2024 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notice of receipt: TOF forwarded from District Court as to Appellant Supreme Born.. [Entered: 04/18/2024 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Notice of receipt: CIP forwarded from District Court as to Appellant Supreme Born.. [Entered: 04/18/2024 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Supreme Born. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 04/12/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Supreme Born. [Entered: 04/12/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Supreme Born on 02/23/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 02/29/2024 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
