OPVHHJV LLC, et al v. Richard Cornelius
OPVHHJV LLC and HPA II BORROWER 2021-1 LLC |
RICHARD CORNELIUS |
24-10622 |
February 28, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Rent, Lease, Ejectment |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
OPVHHJV LLC, et al v. Richard Cornelius |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Judgment entered as to Appellant Richard Cornelius. [Entered: 04/19/2024 08:44 AM] |
Filing 9 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Richard Cornelius. Decision: Dismissed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 04/19/2024 08:37 AM] |
Filing 8 ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Richard Cornelius because the appeal was erroneously dismissed on 04/09/2024. [Entered: 04/18/2024 03:24 PM] |
Filing 7 Notice of receipt: CIP as to Appellant Richard Cornelius. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN this case is closed. [Entered: 04/11/2024 08:47 AM] |
Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Richard Cornelius failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/09/2024 11:59 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Patrick Andrew Garcia for OPVHHJV LLC and HPA II Borrower 2021-1 LLC. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 03/28/2024 09:04 AM] |
Filing 4 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Richard Cornelius. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 03/19/2024 11:49 AM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Richard Cornelius. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 03/19/2024 11:47 AM] |
Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Richard Cornelius was filed on 02/28/2024. Docket Entry 10. [Entered: 02/28/2024 03:06 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Richard Cornelius on 02/26/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/18/2024 as to Appellant Richard Cornelius. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/27/2024 as to Appellee OPVHHJV LLC [Entered: 02/28/2024 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.