Carlos Figueroa-Gibson v. Warden
| CARLOS FIGUEROA-GIBSON |
| WARDEN |
| 24-10658 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Carlos Figueroa-Gibson was filed on 01/25/2024. Docket Entry 13. [Entered: 03/04/2024 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Carlos Figueroa-Gibson on 03/04/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 03/04/2024 04:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carlos Figueroa-Gibson v. Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CARLOS FIGUEROA-GIBSON | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Figueroa-Gibson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia |
| Represented By: | James C. Stuchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
