Alan Grayson v. No Labels, Inc., et al
| ALAN GRAYSON |
| NO LABELS, INC., PROGRESS TOMORROW, INC., UNITED TOGETHER, INC., NANCY JACOBSON, MARK PENN and JOHN DOES |
| 24-10777 |
| March 14, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to to certify question filed by Appellant Alan Grayson [ # 13 ] filed by Attorney William Frederick Rhodes for Appellees John Does, Nancy Jacobson, No Labels, Inc., Mark Penn, Progress Tomorrow, Inc. and United Together, Inc.. [24-10777] (ECF: William Rhodes) [Entered: 05/09/2024 09:49 PM] |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to filed by Appellant Alan Grayson [ # 12 ] filed by Attorney William Frederick Rhodes for Appellees John Does, Nancy Jacobson, No Labels, Inc., Mark Penn, Progress Tomorrow, Inc. and United Together, Inc.. [24-10777] (ECF: William Rhodes) [Entered: 05/09/2024 09:47 PM] |
Filing 17
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to and including May 9, 2024, to file Appellees response to Appellants motions to certify questions of law to Florida Supreme Court and for summary reversal is GRANTED. [ # 16 ] BCG (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 05/02/2024 09:30 AM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for extension of time to file response to motion to 05/09/2024 filed by Nancy Jacobson, No Labels, Inc., Mark Penn, Progress Tomorrow, Inc. and United Together, Inc.. Motion is Unopposed. [16] [24-10777] (ECF: Todd Legon) [Entered: 04/29/2024 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 15 Record on Appeal filed. Exhibit Envelope containing 1 Volume of pleadings consisting of 1 USB drive containing excel format of spreadsheets in Plaintiff's exhibit filed at Doc. [203-1]. [Entered: 04/24/2024 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 14 The briefing schedule issued to Appellant Alan Grayson is hereby rescinded for the following reason(s): MOTION for summary reversal filed by the Appellant.. When the above matter(s) is resolved, the clerk will issue a notice advising counsel and the parties of the new schedule for filing briefs in this appeal. [Entered: 04/22/2024 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION to certify question, to stay the briefing schedule filed by Alan Grayson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [13] [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 04/19/2024 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION for summary reversal filed by Alan Grayson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [12] [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 04/19/2024 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 11 Modified Civil Appeal Statement form filed by Attorney Jason Ward Johnson for Appellant Alan Grayson. Related cases? No. [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 04/11/2024 10:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by William F. Rhodes, Esq. for Appellees No Labels, Inc.; Progress Tomorrow, Inc.; United Together, Inc.; Nancy Jacobson, Mark Penn and John Doe(s). On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10777] (ECF: William Rhodes) [Entered: 04/11/2024 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William F. Rhodes, Esq. for Appellees No Labels, Inc.; Progress Tomorrow, Inc.; United Together, Inc.; Nancy Jacobson, Mark Penn and John Doe(s) Related cases? No. [24-10777] (ECF: William Rhodes) [Entered: 04/11/2024 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Todd R. Legon for John Does, Nancy Jacobson, No Labels, Inc., Progress Tomorrow, Inc. and United Together, Inc.. Related cases? No. [24-10777] (ECF: Todd Legon) [Entered: 04/11/2024 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 04/11/2024 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Alan Grayson. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/23/2024. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/01/2024 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Jason Ward Johnson for Appellant Alan Grayson. Related cases? No. [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 03/28/2024 09:07 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Jason Ward Johnson for Appellant Alan Grayson. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 03/28/2024 08:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jason Ward Johnson for Appellant Alan Grayson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 03/28/2024 08:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jason Johnson for Alan Grayson Jason Ward Johnson for Alan Grayson. Related cases? No. [24-10777] (ECF: Jason Johnson) [Entered: 03/28/2024 08:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Alan Grayson on 03/13/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/01/2024 as to Appellant Alan Grayson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/11/2024 as to Appellee No Labels, Inc. [Entered: 03/14/2024 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
