Carlton Mathews v. J. Walters, et al
| CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS |
| J. W. WALTERS, CHAD LESSER, T. BARKER, KEVIN RODRIGUEZ, GUNN and SEARS |
| 24-10794 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Carlton Xavier Mathews failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or file a consent form within the time fixed by the rules.; and failed to file a Transcript Order Form in both this Court and the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/09/2024 01:36 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Carlton Xavier Mathews. [Entered: 04/04/2024 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10794] (ECF: Brian Flynn-Fallon) [Entered: 04/01/2024 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brian R. Flynn-Fallon for: Sears, J.W. Walters, T. Baker, Gunn, and Chad Lesser. Related cases? No. [24-10794] (ECF: Brian Flynn-Fallon) [Entered: 04/01/2024 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Carlton Xavier Mathews on 03/15/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 03/18/2024 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.