USA v. Shane Martin
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
SHANE MARTIN |
24-10854 |
March 21, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Preston Larry Presley for Shane Martin. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 03/28/2024 03:42 PM] |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Brett Joseph Talley for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10854] (ECF: Brett Talley) [Entered: 03/28/2024 02:13 PM] |
Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Shane Martin, Court Reporter: Patricia Starkie, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 03/13/2024 , Plea Hearing 12/13/2023. [Entered: 03/28/2024 01:20 PM] |
Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Preston Larry Presley for Appellant Shane Martin. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [24-10854] (ECF: Preston Presley) [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:05 PM] |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Preston Larry Presley for Appellant Shane Martin. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10854] (ECF: Preston Presley) [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:03 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brett J. Talley for USA Related cases? No. [24-10854] (ECF: Brett Talley) [Entered: 03/26/2024 12:38 PM] |
Filing 3 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Shane Martin was filed on 03/22/2024. Docket Entry 254. [Entered: 03/25/2024 11:19 AM] |
Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Preston Larry Presley for Appellant Shane Martin. [Entered: 03/22/2024 11:47 AM] |
Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Shane Martin on 03/17/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. USDC motion pending: Motion to appoint new counsel filed on 03/17/2024. [Entered: 03/22/2024 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Shane Martin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Brett Joseph Talley |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Alabama |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SHANE MARTIN | |
Represented By: | Preston Larry Presley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.