Craven Casper v. FPC Montgomery Warden, et al
| CRAVEN CASPER |
| FPC MONTGOMERY WARDEN and CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA |
| 24-10948 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney James J. DuBois for Appellees Chief United States Probation Officer, Southern District of Florida and FPC Montgomery Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10948] (ECF: James DuBois) [Entered: 04/05/2024 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James J. DuBois for Chief United States Probation Officer, Southern District of Florida and FPC Montgomery Warden and U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Alabama for Chief United States Probation Officer, Southern District of Florida and FPC Montgomery Warden. Related cases? No. [24-10948] (ECF: James DuBois) [Entered: 04/05/2024 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Craven Casper was filed on 03/29/2024. Docket Entry 61. [Entered: 04/01/2024 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Craven Casper on 03/27/2024 USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed on 03/27/2024. DE# 58. Fee Status: IFP Pending. [Entered: 03/29/2024 12:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
