Dallas Wims v. USA
DALLAS JEROME WIMS |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
24-10963 |
March 28, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [24-10963] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 04/03/2024 01:44 PM] |
Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Dallas Jerome Wims was filed on 01/23/2024. Docket Entry 107. [Entered: 04/02/2024 05:04 PM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Dallas Jerome Wims on 03/28/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 04/02/2024 04:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Dallas Wims v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: DALLAS JEROME WIMS | |
Represented By: | Dallas Jerome Wims |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Daniel Matzkin |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.