Bozorgmehr Pouyeh v. Public Health Trust of Jackson Health System, et al
| BOZORGMEHR POUYEH |
| PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM, a.k.a. the "Trust", CARLOS A. MIGOYA, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, STEVEN J. GEDDE, Program Director of Opthamology Residency Program, STEFANIE R. BROWN, Program Director of Preliminary & Internal Medecine f.k.a. Dr. Doe, J. DONALD TEMPLE, Program Director of Harrington Program and DOE, Former Program Director of Preliminary and Internal Medicine |
| 24-10988 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Bozorgmehr Pouyeh. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/13/2024. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/03/2024 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Bozorgmehr Pouyeh was filed on 05/04/2018. Docket Entry 81. [Entered: 04/03/2024 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Bozorgmehr Pouyeh. No hearings. [Entered: 04/03/2024 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bozorgmehr Pouyeh on 03/29/2024. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/22/2024 as to Appellant Bozorgmehr Pouyeh. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/01/2024 as to Appellee Public Health Trust of Jackson Health System [Entered: 04/03/2024 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
