Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Naman Augusta, LLC
| WIHLY HARPO-BROWN |
| NAMAN AUGUSTA, LLC and INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION |
| SERVICE |
| 24-11070 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to reinstate prior motions [ # 13 ] filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s):. No motions were mooted by dismissal. [Entered: 06/03/2024 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION to reinstate prior motions filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [13] [Entered: 06/03/2024 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 12 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for Leave to File Out of Time [ # 11 ], Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 11 ], Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 11 ], Motion for extension to file appellant brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The deficiencies that caused this case to be dismissed have been remedied. Additionally, a briefing schedule has not been issued. [Entered: 05/24/2024 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to file documents out of time, to reinstate appeal, to proceed IFP, for extension of time to file appellants brief to 05/24/2024 filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 05/24/2024 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 10 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 05/13/2024. Docket Entry 100. [Entered: 05/16/2024 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension of time to file motion for leave to proceed [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The deficiencies that caused this case to be dismissed have been remedied. [Entered: 05/07/2024 02:57 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown because the appeal was erroneously dismissed on 04/30/2024. [Entered: 05/07/2024 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. [Entered: 05/07/2024 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Wihly Harpo-Brown. No hearings. [Entered: 05/07/2024 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for extension to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] --[Edited 05/07/2024 by TJS] [Entered: 05/07/2024 02:42 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/30/2024 08:08 AM]
|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sean L. Hynes for Intermark Management Corporation Sean L. Hynes for Service. Related cases? Yes. [24-11070] (ECF: Sean Hynes) [Entered: 04/22/2024 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Notice of Appeal filed by Party Wihly Harpo-Brown. [Entered: 04/12/2024 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown on 04/08/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
