Davita Key v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC, et al
DAVITA M. KEY |
HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA, LLC, HYUNDAI ENGINEERING AMERICA, INC. and DYNAMIC SECURITY, INC. |
24-11126 |
April 11, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Wesley C. Redmond for Dynamic Security, Inc.. Related cases? Yes. [24-11126] (ECF: Wesley Redmond) [Entered: 04/19/2024 06:31 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Susan Ware Bullock for Dynamic Security, Inc.. Related cases? Yes. [24-11126] (ECF: Susan Bullock) [Entered: 04/19/2024 06:29 PM] |
Filing 3 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Davita M. Key. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/21/2024. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:54 PM] |
Filing 2 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Heather Newsom Leonard for Appellant Davita M. Key. No hearings. [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:52 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Davita M. Key on 04/10/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/30/2024 as to Appellant Davita M. Key. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/10/2024 as to Appellees Dynamic Security, Inc., Hyundai Engineering America, Inc. and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.