Thomas Burns v. BrandSafway Solutions, LLC
| THOMAS A. BURNS |
| BRANDSAFWAY SOLUTIONS, LLC |
| 24-11517 |
| May 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Thomas A. Burns on 05/13/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/03/2024 as to Appellant Thomas A. Burns. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/12/2024 as to Appellee BrandSafway Solutions, LLC [Entered: 05/15/2024 11:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Burns v. BrandSafway Solutions, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: THOMAS A. BURNS | |
| Represented By: | Thomas A. Burns |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BRANDSAFWAY SOLUTIONS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Wood Geisler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
