Tyrone Kemp v. Kevin Pogorzelski
TYRONE ANTHONY KEMP |
KEVIN POGORZELSKI |
24-11519 |
May 8, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tyrone Anthony Kemp on 05/08/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/03/2024 as to Appellant Tyrone Anthony Kemp. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/13/2024 as to Appellee Kevin Pogorzelski [Entered: 05/16/2024 11:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Tyrone Kemp v. Kevin Pogorzelski | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TYRONE ANTHONY KEMP | |
Represented By: | Kimberly A. Ellison |
Represented By: | Wayne B. Kendall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: KEVIN POGORZELSKI | |
Represented By: | Russell A. Britt |
Represented By: | Todd Orlando Pearson |
Represented By: | Stuart Fallin Sumner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.