Tyrone Kemp v. Kevin Pogorzelski
Plaintiff: TYRONE ANTHONY KEMP
Defendant: KEVIN POGORZELSKI
Case Number: 24-11519
Filed: May 8, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tyrone Anthony Kemp on 05/08/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/03/2024 as to Appellant Tyrone Anthony Kemp. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/13/2024 as to Appellee Kevin Pogorzelski [Entered: 05/16/2024 11:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tyrone Kemp v. Kevin Pogorzelski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYRONE ANTHONY KEMP
Represented By: Kimberly A. Ellison
Represented By: Wayne B. Kendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEVIN POGORZELSKI
Represented By: Russell A. Britt
Represented By: Todd Orlando Pearson
Represented By: Stuart Fallin Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?