Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
CODY EDWARD DAVIS |
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
24-11522 |
May 8, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant Cody Edward Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [24-11522] (ECF: Susanne Sichta) [Entered: 05/15/2024 11:22 AM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Cody Edward Davis on 05/07/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. [Entered: 05/14/2024 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CODY EDWARD DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Richard Adam Sichta |
Represented By: | Susanne K. Sichta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.