Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner: CODY EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 24-11522
Filed: May 8, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 22, 2025 Cody Edward Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2024 Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Richard Chambers Valuntas for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-11522] (ECF: Richard Valuntas) [Entered: 06/11/2024 08:03 AM]
June 10, 2024 Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant Cody Edward Davis. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 06/10/2024 01:47 PM]
June 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Motion for extension to file Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Appellant Cody Edward Davis is GRANTED by clerk [ # 8 ].. [Entered: 06/10/2024 01:45 PM]
June 10, 2024 Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant Cody Edward Davis. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [24-11522] (ECF: Susanne Sichta) [Entered: 06/10/2024 11:59 AM]
June 10, 2024 Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant Cody Edward Davis. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-11522] (ECF: Susanne Sichta) [Entered: 06/10/2024 11:57 AM]
June 10, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION for extension of time to file Certificate of Interested Persons to 06/10/2024 filed by Cody Edward Davis. Motion is Unopposed. [8] [24-11522] (ECF: Susanne Sichta) [Entered: 06/10/2024 11:56 AM]
June 10, 2024 Filing 7 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Cody Edward Davis. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 06/10/2024 11:17 AM]
June 10, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Richard Adam Sichta for Cody Edward Davis and Susanne K. Sichta for Cody Edward Davis. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 06/10/2024 11:15 AM]
June 4, 2024 Filing 5 USDC order on limited remand as to Appellant Cody Edward Davis filed on 06/03/2024. Docket Entry 31. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a certificate of appealability shall be REISSUED. [Entered: 06/04/2024 09:30 AM]
May 22, 2024 Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Valuntas Appellee Related cases? No. [24-11522] (ECF: Richard Valuntas) [Entered: 05/22/2024 07:09 AM]
May 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Accordingly, the district court's grant of a COA is VACATED, and this case is hereby REMANDED for the limited purpose of the district court reissuing its COA in compli-ance with Spencer and Rule 11(a)..; ELB and BL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 05/21/2024 10:23 AM]
May 15, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant Cody Edward Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [24-11522] (ECF: Susanne Sichta) [Entered: 05/15/2024 11:22 AM]
May 8, 2024 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Cody Edward Davis on 05/07/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. [Entered: 05/14/2024 03:14 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CODY EDWARD DAVIS
Represented By: Richard Adam Sichta
Represented By: Susanne K. Sichta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Richard Chambers Valuntas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?