James Esseks, et alIn re: James Esseks, et al
| In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL CHARLES, LATISHA FAULKS, MILO INGLEHART and KATHLEEN HARTNETT |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA |
| 24-11618 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION MOOT: Motion to show cause is MOOT [ # 2 ]; Motion for writ of mandamus is MOOT [ # 1 ] due to clerk's order filed 05/21/2024. Motion filed by Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. [Entered: 05/21/2024 05:13 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Petitioners James D. Esseks, Carl Charles, Latisha Faulks, Milo Inglehart and Kathleen Hartnett is GRANTED by clerk [ # 7 ]. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date; ORDER: Motion to withdraw motion filed by Petitioners James D. Esseks, Carl Charles, Latisha Faulks, Milo Inglehart and Kathleen Hartnett is GRANTED by clerk [ # 7 ]. [Entered: 05/21/2024 05:10 PM]
|
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Donald Beaton Verrilli, Jr. for Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. Related cases? No. [24-11618] (ECF: Donald Verrilli) [Entered: 05/21/2024 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to withdraw for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart, to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [7] [24-11618] (ECF: Donald Verrilli) [Entered: 05/20/2024 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR - APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Donald Beaton Verrilli, Jr. for Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. Related cases? No. [24-11618]--[Edited 05/21/2024 by DHH] (ECF: Donald Verrilli) [Entered: 05/20/2024 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellate fee was paid on 05/20/2024 as to Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. [Entered: 05/20/2024 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. [Entered: 05/20/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Exhibit Documents filed by Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart in support of Motion for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners James D. Esseks, Carl Charles, Latisha Faulks, Milo Inglehart and Kathleen Hartnett in 24-11618 [ # 1 ], Motion to stay to show cause filed by Petitioners James D. Esseks, Carl Charles, Latisha Faulks, Milo Inglehart and Kathleen Hartnett in 24-11618 [ # 2 ]. [Entered: 05/20/2024 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to stay and show cause filed by Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 05/20/2024 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioners Carl Charles, James D. Esseks, Latisha Faulks, Kathleen Hartnett and Milo Inglehart. Fee Status: Fee Paid [Entered: 05/20/2024 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
