Wihly Harpo-Brown v. FCI Coleman Low Warden, et al
| WIHLY HARPO-BROWN |
| FCI COLEMAN LOW WARDEN, FNU BELLTON, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer, FNU GALLION, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer, Lieutenant, FNU ORTIZ, Coleman Low Nurse, FNU HERNANDEZ, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer, Lieutenant, FNU ELDRIDGE, Coleman Low Nurse, JOHN DOE, II, Unknown white male Nurse, FNU MATHIEUS, Coleman Low Medical Director, JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations, B JACKSON, Coleman Low Nurse, FRIEBERG, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer and FNU FOSTER, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer |
| 24-11694 |
| May 24, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US def) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Wihly Harpo-Brown. No hearings. [Entered: 06/26/2024 10:37 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/21/2024 10:55 AM]
|
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Wihly Harpo-Brown on 05/22/2024. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 05/28/2024 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.