USA v. Luis Rivas Mendoza
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| LUIS HENRY RIVAS MENDOZA |
| 24-11776 |
| May 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [24-11776] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 06/05/2024 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Luis Henry Rivas Mendoza on 05/28/2024. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 06/04/2024 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Luis Rivas Mendoza | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Matzkin |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LUIS HENRY RIVAS MENDOZA | |
| Represented By: | Luis Henry Rivas Mendoza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
