USA v. Alfred Shavers, et al
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALFRED LAMAR SHAVERS and TYRONE JAMES JONES
Case Number: 24-11943
Filed: June 11, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 20, 2025 USA v. Alfred Shavers, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2024 Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Tyrone J. Jones, Court Reporter: FLMD Court Reporter TBA, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 05/04/2023 ; Transcript Order: Filer: Tyrone J. Jones, Court Reporter: Amie Renea First, Proceeding Type and Date: Trial 02/20/2024 - 02/23/2024, Sentencing 06/03/2024 , Other Hearings 06/08/2023 , Other Hearings 09/14/2023 , Other Hearings 11/09/2023 , Other Hearings 01/11/2024. [Entered: 06/21/2024 10:27 AM]
June 20, 2024 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Joseph Torres for Appellant Tyrone James Jones. Transcript(s) ordered. [24-11943] (ECF: Joseph Torres) [Entered: 06/20/2024 08:16 AM]
June 20, 2024 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Torres, Joseph for Tyrone James Jones. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-11943] (ECF: Joseph Torres) [Entered: 06/20/2024 08:13 AM]
June 18, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to file substitution of counsel filed by Alfred Lamar Shavers. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [5] [24-11943] (ECF: Ernest Chang) [Entered: 06/18/2024 11:45 AM]
June 14, 2024 Filing 4 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Joseph Torres for Appellant Tyrone James Jones. [Entered: 06/14/2024 08:33 AM]
June 14, 2024 Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Ernest Leo Chang for Appellant Alfred Lamar Shavers. [Entered: 06/14/2024 08:03 AM]
June 13, 2024 Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tyrone James Jones on 06/11/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 06/14/2024 08:21 AM]
June 11, 2024 Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Alfred Lamar Shavers on 06/11/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 06/14/2024 08:01 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Alfred Shavers, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALFRED LAMAR SHAVERS
Represented By: Ernest Leo Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TYRONE JAMES JONES
Represented By: Joseph Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?