Joshua Pee v. Johnathan Zimmerman, et al
| JOSHUA ANDREA PEE |
| CAPTAIN STRICKLAND KEVIN, OFFICER DAVID FANEGIO, SERGEANT MARIO ALARCON, SERGEANT BIRGIT HANDZIK, HAROLD LAUREDAN and OFFICER JOHNATHAN ZIMMERMAN |
| 24-12211 |
| July 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Joshua Andrea Pee failed to file a Transcript Order Form in both this Court and the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/20/2024 09:49 AM]
|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christopher J. Whitelock for Mario Alarcon, David Fanegio, Birgit Handzik, Strickland Kevin, Harold Lauredan and Johnathan Zimmerman. Related cases? No. [24-12211] (ECF: Christopher Whitelock) [Entered: 08/08/2024 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Christopher J. Whitelock for Johnathan Zimmerman, Strickland Kevin, Mario Alarcon, Birgit Handzik, David Fanegio and Harold Lauredan. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 08/08/2024 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Christopher J. Whitelock for Appellees Mario Alarcon, David Fanegio, Birgit Handzik, Strickland Kevin, Harold Lauredan and Johnathan Zimmerman. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-12211] (ECF: Christopher Whitelock) [Entered: 08/08/2024 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Joshua Andrea Pee. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 07/30/2024 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Joshua Andrea Pee. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 07/30/2024 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joshua Andrea Pee on 07/08/2024. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/29/2024 as to Appellant Joshua Andrea Pee. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/08/2024 as to Appellee Strickland Kevin. [Entered: 07/11/2024 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
