Darrell Parks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
| DARRELL JAMES PARKS |
| WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I |
| 24-12227 |
| July 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice of receipt: Inquiry as to Appellant Darrell James Parks.. [Entered: 09/06/2024 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice that no action will be taken on In Forma Pauperis, Transcript order form and certficate of interested persons. filed by Appellant Darrell James Parks. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The deficiencies that caused this case to be dismissed have not been remedied.. [Entered: 08/07/2024 02:32 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Darrell James Parks failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/01/2024 05:20 PM]
|
| Filing 4 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Darrell James Parks. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 07/30/2024 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Emily Chang for Appellee Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-12227] (ECF: Emily Chang) [Entered: 07/24/2024 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily C. L. Chang U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I. Related cases? No. [24-12227] (ECF: Emily Chang) [Entered: 07/23/2024 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darrell James Parks on 07/09/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 07/11/2024 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Darrell Parks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Emily Chang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DARRELL JAMES PARKS | |
| Represented By: | Darrell James Parks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
