Joshua Jordan v. The Closet Factory Franchise Corporation, et al
| JOSHUA JORDAN |
| CLOSET FACTORY, An Unregistered Florida Business Entity, also known as Closet Factory Tampa, also known as Tampa Closet Factory, CLOSET FACTORY FRANCHISE CORPORATION, A California Corporation, CLOSET FACTORY, SYLVIA ROSADO-DELAY, Individually and JACK GREEN, Individually |
| 24-12229 |
| July 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Joshua Jordan v. The Closet Factory Franchise Corporation, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Joshua Jordan. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 08/23/2024 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 Received 4 paper copies of EBrief, filed by Appellant Joshua Jordan. [Entered: 08/23/2024 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Joshua Jordan. [24-12229] (ECF: Joshua Jordan) [Entered: 08/15/2024 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 Briefing Notice issued to Appellee Closet Factory Franchise Corporation. Appellee's brief is due on or before 09/16/2024. [Entered: 08/15/2024 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Sammy Hamed for Closet Factory Franchise Corporation, Closet Factory, Sylvia Rosado-Delay and Jack Green and Jennifer Lynn Marino for Closet Factory Franchise Corporation, Closet Factory, Sylvia Rosado-Delay and Jack Green. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 08/15/2024 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant's brief filed by Joshua Jordan. [24-12229] (ECF: Joshua Jordan) [Entered: 08/13/2024 07:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Joshua Jordan. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 07/30/2024 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice that no action will be taken on Civil Appeal Statement filed by Appellant Joshua Jordan. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Document not required to be filed by pro se appellant. [Entered: 07/29/2024 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Party Joshua Jordan. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [24-12229] (ECF: Joshua Jordan) [Entered: 07/28/2024 11:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Party Joshua Jordan. Related cases? No. [24-12229] (ECF: Joshua Jordan) [Entered: 07/28/2024 11:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Joshua Jordan. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-12229] (ECF: Joshua Jordan) [Entered: 07/28/2024 10:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joshua Jordan on 07/09/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/30/2024 as to Appellant Joshua Jordan. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/09/2024 as to Appellee The Closet Factory Franchise Corporation. [Entered: 07/12/2024 12:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
