Kenneth Roberson v. John Doe, et al
| KENNETH EARL ROBERSON |
| STEVEN SETZER, KEVIN H. TURNER, JOHN DOE, BYRD, FIELDS, CHAD BROOKS and LEWTER |
| 24-12371 |
| July 24, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: Notice to the court as to Appellant Kenneth Earl Roberson. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN This appeal is closed.. [Entered: 09/16/2024 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of receipt: Notice to the court RE: Checks and Balances and TOF, USDC Judgment and copy of letter from Supreme Court of Louisiana as to Appellant Kenneth Earl Roberson. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN this appeal is closed. [Entered: 09/16/2024 05:50 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Kenneth Earl Roberson failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/13/2024 10:52 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Notice of receipt: Notice to the court regarding filings and filing fee as to Appellant Kenneth Earl Roberson.. [Entered: 08/13/2024 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kenneth Earl Roberson on 07/23/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 07/25/2024 04:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
