Michael Oliver v. Cam Ward, et al
| MICHAEL DARNELL OLIVER |
| TANYA MORRIS, CAM WARD, DARRYL LITTLETON, DWAYNE SPURLOCK, LEIGH GWANTHNEY and ANGELA LAWSON |
| 24-12450 |
| July 31, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Michael Darnell Oliver. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The deficiencies that caused this case to be dismissed have not been remedied.. [Entered: 09/16/2024 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Michael Darnell Oliver. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 09/16/2024 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Michael Darnell Oliver. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 08/26/2024 04:08 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Michael Darnell Oliver has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/20/2024 11:32 AM]
|
| Filing 2 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 08/01/2024. Docket Entry 15. [Entered: 08/01/2024 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Darnell Oliver on 07/26/2024. Fee Status: Three Strikes. [Entered: 08/01/2024 05:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
