Traymonte Snipes v. A. Rivero, et al
| TRAYMONTE BIRTANNE SNIPES |
| A. RIVERO, in their individual and official capacity, M. HUTCHINSON, in their individual and official capacity, CARMINE MARCENO, Sheriff, in their individual and official capacity, AVIANADO, in their individual and official capacity, LUNA, in their individual and official capacity, R. PEREZ, in their individual and official capacity, E. LEVATO, in their individual and official capacity and J. KAIZER, in their individual and official capacity |
| 24-12566 |
| August 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Returned Mail was received for Party Traymonte Birtanne Snipes. IN RE: 9/11/2024 DIS-2 Letter and Entry of Dismissal [Entered: 09/13/2024 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 Returned Mail was received for Party Traymonte Birtanne Snipes. IN RE: 9/3/2024 PLRA - 7 Three Strikes [Entered: 09/11/2024 03:52 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Traymonte Birtanne Snipes has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/28/2024 12:40 PM]
|
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Traymonte Birtanne Snipes on 08/07/2024. Fee Status: Three Strikes. [Entered: 08/09/2024 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.