Romeo Sanchez v. USA
| ROMEO VALENTIN SANCHEZ |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-12692 |
| August 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Romeo Valentin Sanchez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 09/16/2024 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Romeo Valentin Sanchez. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/16/2024 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Romeo Valentin Sanchez. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 09/16/2024 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michelle Thresher Taylor for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-12692] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 09/09/2024 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. Related cases? No. [24-12692] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 09/05/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Romeo Valentin Sanchez was filed on 08/22/2024. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 08/23/2024 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Romeo Valentin Sanchez was filed on 06/18/2024. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 08/23/2024 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Romeo Valentin Sanchez on 08/19/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 08/23/2024 12:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Romeo Sanchez v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROMEO VALENTIN SANCHEZ | |
| Represented By: | Romeo Valentin Sanchez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Michelle Thresher Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
