Matthew Jones v. Georgia State Police
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: GEORGIA STATE POLICE
Case Number: 24-12977
Filed: September 11, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Matthew Jones failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/28/2024 12:24 PM]
October 7, 2024 Filing 7 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Matthew Jones. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 10/07/2024 02:24 PM]
October 7, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Matthew Jones. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/07/2024 02:22 PM]
October 7, 2024 Filing 5 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Matthew Jones was filed on 10/03/2024. [Entered: 10/07/2024 12:57 PM]
October 7, 2024 Filing 4 USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Matthew Jones was filed on 10/01/2024. [Entered: 10/07/2024 12:41 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 3 Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Matthew Jones DE #7: Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from a Judgment or Order, and that filing is within the entry docketed as a notice of appeal. (Doc. 7 at 2-12). [Entered: 09/30/2024 11:51 AM]
September 16, 2024 Filing 2 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Matthew Jones was filed on 12/08/2023. Docket Entry 2. [Entered: 09/16/2024 08:55 AM]
September 11, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Matthew Jones on 09/10/2024. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/04/2024 as to Appellant Matthew Jones. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/15/2024 as to Appellee Georgia State Police. [Entered: 09/16/2024 08:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew Jones v. Georgia State Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGIA STATE POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Represented By: Matthew Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?