James Randall Rogers v. Warden, GDP
Petitioner: JAMES RANDALL ROGERS
Respondent: GDCP WARDEN
Case Number: 24-13080
Filed: September 17, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Motion for an extension of time to and including December 4, 2024, to file Appellants motion to expand the certificate of appealability filed by Appellant James Randall Rogers is GRANTED. [ # 6 ] Motion to Expand the COA due on 12/04/2024. KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/17/2024 06:42 PM]
October 15, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 12/04/2024 filed by James Randall Rogers. Motion is Unopposed. [6] [24-13080] (ECF: Nathan Potek) [Entered: 10/15/2024 10:53 AM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Nathan Potek for Appellant James Randall Rogers. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [24-13080] (ECF: Nathan Potek) [Entered: 09/30/2024 02:58 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Nathan Potek for Appellant James Randall Rogers. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13080] (ECF: Nathan Potek) [Entered: 09/30/2024 02:52 PM]
September 17, 2024 Filing 3 USDC order Granting appointment of counsel as to Appellant James Randall Rogers was filed on 04/06/2017. Docket Entry 115. Petitioner's motion to appoint the Federal Defender Program, Inc., for the Northem District of Georgia to serve as his counsel alongside William A. Morrison. (Doc. No. 1#^. For good cause shown, this motion is GRANTED. [Entered: 09/24/2024 09:36 AM]
September 17, 2024 Filing 2 USDC Order granting in part COA as to Appellant James Randall Rogers was filed on 09/18/2024. Docket Entry 189. The Court GRANTS Petitioner a certificate of appealability with respect to all of his Ground Three claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The Court DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability in all other respects. [Entered: 09/24/2024 09:32 AM]
September 17, 2024 Filing 1 DEATH PENALTY APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Attorney Nathan Potek for Appellant James Randall Rogers on 09/16/2024. Appellant brief due 40 days Fee Status: Fee Not Required. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/23/2024 04:14 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Randall Rogers v. Warden, GDP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES RANDALL ROGERS
Represented By: William A. Morrison
Represented By: Nathan Potek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: GDCP WARDEN
Represented By: Sabrina Graham
Represented By: Beth Attaway Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?