USA v. Tomas Ramirez
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TOMAS SANCHEZ RAMIREZ |
| 24-13198 |
| September 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lawrence R. Sommerfeld for USA Related cases? No. [24-13198] (ECF: Lawrence Sommerfeld) [Entered: 10/04/2024 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James Y. Hwang for USA Related cases? No. [24-13198] (ECF: James Hwang) [Entered: 10/04/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Suzanne Hashimi for Appellant Tomas Sanchez Ramirez. Transcript(s) ordered. [24-13198] (ECF: Suzanne Hashimi) [Entered: 10/04/2024 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Suzanne Hashimi for Appellant Tomas Sanchez Ramirez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13198] (ECF: Suzanne Hashimi) [Entered: 10/04/2024 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Nicole M. Kaplan for Appellant Tomas Ramirez Related cases? No. [24-13198] (ECF: Nicole Kaplan) [Entered: 10/04/2024 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 EXPEDITED CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tomas Sanchez Ramirez on 09/28/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 10/03/2024 03:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
