Tanesha Graham, et al v. City of South Fulton
| TANESHA GRAHAM and JOSEPH KING |
| CITY OF SOUTH FULTON |
| 24-13286 |
| October 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for leave to file Certificate of Interested Persons, Web Based CIP, Civil Appeal Statement and Transcript Order Form out of time filed by Tanesha Graham and Joseph King. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [16] [24-13286] (ECF: Arnold Lizana) [Entered: 11/08/2024 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Arnold Lizana for Appellants. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13286] (ECF: Arnold Lizana) [Entered: 11/08/2024 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Arnold J. Lizana III for the Appellants Arnold James Lizana, III for Tanesha Graham and Joseph King. Related cases? Yes. [24-13286] (ECF: Arnold Lizana) [Entered: 11/07/2024 08:31 AM] |
| Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Sharon P. Morgan for Appellee City of South Fulton. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13286] (ECF: Sharon Morgan) [Entered: 11/06/2024 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Tanesha Graham. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 10/31/2024 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Artur Davis for Joseph King and Tanesha Graham. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/31/2024 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 10 Artur Davis for Appellants Joseph King and Tanesha Graham and Arnold James Lizana, III for Appellants Joseph King and Tanesha Graham is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files BOTH (1) a Civil Appeal Statement AND (2) a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 10/31/2024 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Transcript Order Form filed by Appellant Tanesha GrahamAttorney Artur Davis for Appellants Joseph King and Tanesha Graham. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): An Appearance of Counsel form has not been filed, See 11th Cir. R. 46-5.. [Entered: 10/31/2024 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notice that no action will be taken on Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Attorney Arnold James Lizana, III for Appellants Joseph King and Tanesha Graham. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): An Appearance of Counsel form has not been filed, See 11th Cir. R. 46-5.. [Entered: 10/29/2024 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Arnold James Lizana, III for Appellants Tanesha Graham and Joseph King. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [24-13286] (ECF: Arnold Lizana) [Entered: 10/29/2024 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Arnold Lizana for Appellants. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13286] (ECF: Arnold Lizana) [Entered: 10/29/2024 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Pamela Eunice Palmer for City of South Fulton. Related cases? No. [24-13286] (ECF: Pamela Palmer) [Entered: 10/22/2024 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sharon P. Morgan for City of South Fulton. Related cases? No. [24-13286] (ECF: Sharon Morgan) [Entered: 10/22/2024 05:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Pamela Eunice Palmer for City of South Fulton. Related cases? No. [24-13286] (ECF: Pamela Palmer) [Entered: 10/22/2024 05:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sharon P. Morgan for City of South Fulton. Related cases? No. [24-13286] (ECF: Sharon Morgan) [Entered: 10/22/2024 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Tanesha Graham and Joseph King on 10/06/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/29/2024 as to Appellant Tanesha Graham. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/08/2024 as to Appellee City of South Fulton. [Entered: 10/11/2024 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
