Robert Clark v. Kenneth Cowens
Plaintiff: ROBERT LOUIS CLARK
Defendant: KENNETH COWENS
Case Number: 24-13301
Filed: October 11, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Robert Louis Clark failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:44 AM]
November 27, 2024 Filing 5 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Robert Louis Clark. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:19 PM]
November 27, 2024 Filing 4 USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 10/16/2024. Docket Entry 44. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:19 PM]
November 27, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Christopher Michael Carr for Kenneth Cowens. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:16 PM]
November 12, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Robert Louis Clark. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/12/2024 02:20 PM]
October 11, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Robert Louis Clark on 10/08/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 10/15/2024 08:59 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Clark v. Kenneth Cowens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KENNETH COWENS
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT LOUIS CLARK
Represented By: Robert Louis Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?