Michael Rufus v. Director of Geo Residential Reentry Center
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS |
DIRECTOR OF GEO RESIDENTIAL REENTRY CENTER |
24-13314 |
October 15, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:15 PM] |
Filing 5 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Michael Alonza Rufus. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:14 PM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Michael Alonza Rufus. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:12 PM] |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Julia Kapusta for Appellee Director of Geo Residential Reentry Center. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13314] (ECF: Julia Kapusta) [Entered: 10/30/2024 10:58 AM] |
Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Julia R. Kapusta for Director of Geo Residential Reentry Center U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for Director of Geo Residential Reentry Center. Related cases? No. [24-13314] (ECF: Julia Kapusta) [Entered: 10/29/2024 01:45 PM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Alonza Rufus on 10/07/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 10/16/2024 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Rufus v. Director of Geo Residential Reentry Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS | |
Represented By: | Michael Alonza Rufus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DIRECTOR OF GEO RESIDENTIAL REENTRY CENTER | |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
Represented By: | Julia Kapusta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.