Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 24-13362
Filed: October 16, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION MOOT: Motion for certificate of appealability is MOOT [ # 6 ]; Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is MOOT [ # 7 ] due to clerk's order filed 12/13/2024. Motion filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. [Entered: 12/13/2024 02:57 PM]
December 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Raymond Claudio failed to file a prisoner financial statement within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 12/13/2024 02:55 PM]
December 2, 2024 Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension to file prisoner statement "Motion for enlargment of time or in the alternative motion to accept certified financial bank statements" [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Raymond ClaudioParty Raymond Claudio. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 12/02/2024 02:04 PM]
November 29, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION for extension of time to file prisoner financial statement to 12/30/2024 filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 12/02/2024 02:02 PM]
November 5, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 11/12/2024 08:05 AM]
November 5, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 11/12/2024 08:00 AM]
November 5, 2024 Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Raymond Claudio. No hearings. [Entered: 11/12/2024 07:57 AM]
November 5, 2024 Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. [Entered: 11/12/2024 07:56 AM]
November 1, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of receipt: Notice to Court as to Appellant Raymond Claudio.. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:01 PM]
October 21, 2024 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Raymond Claudio was filed on 09/12/2024. Docket Entry 4. [Entered: 10/21/2024 09:16 AM]
October 16, 2024 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio on 10/15/2024 USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed on 10/15/2024. DE# 8. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 10/21/2024 09:10 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Represented By: Raymond Claudio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?