Eric Watkins v. Shields, et al
| ERIC WATKINS |
| RIVERLAND PARK, SHIELDS, MICHAEL CARABEO and SCHRIDER |
| 24-13379 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension to file appellant brief [ # 12 ] filed by Appellant Eric Watkins. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s):. Briefing has not started because fees are not resolved. [Entered: 12/09/2024 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION for extension of time to file appellants brief filed by Appellant Eric Watkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [12] [Entered: 12/09/2024 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jeffery R. Lawley for Appellees Michael Carabeo, Schrider and Shields. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-13379] (ECF: Jeffery Lawley) [Entered: 11/20/2024 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Jeffery R. Lawley for Shields, Schrider and Michael Carabeo. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/20/2024 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 9 Returned Mail was received for Attorney Lori Brooke Lewellen for Appellees Shields and Schrider. IN RE: October 22, 2024, CIVIL - Notice of Docketing [Entered: 11/19/2024 03:05 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: Motion for extension of time to file IFP motion filed by Appellant Eric Watkins is GRANTED by clerk [ # 6 ]. to 11/26/2024. [Entered: 11/15/2024 12:43 PM]
|
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Eric Watkins. No transcript requested. [Entered: 11/13/2024 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis to 11/26/2024 filed by Appellant Eric Watkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 11/13/2024 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by JEFFERY R. LAWLEY FOR TIMOTHY SHIELDS AND VINCENT SCHRIDER Related cases? No. [24-13379] (ECF: Jeffery Lawley) [Entered: 11/06/2024 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Jeffery R. Lawley for Shields, Schrider and Michael Carabeo. Document Not Legible/Complete, you must list all parties whom you represent on the form. [Entered: 11/06/2024 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffery R. Lawley - Officer Timothy Shields and Officer Vincent Schrider Related cases? No. [24-13379] (ECF: Jeffery Lawley) [Entered: 11/05/2024 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Eric Watkins. [Entered: 11/05/2024 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Eric Watkins on 10/17/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/12/2024 as to Appellant Eric Watkins. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/19/2024 as to Appellee Shields. [Entered: 10/22/2024 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
