Fabian Woods, Jr. v. Georgia State of, et al
| FABIAN WOODS, JR. |
| MARK JACKSON LLC, GEORGIA STATE OF and CLAYTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE |
| 24-13569 |
| October 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION MOOT: Motion for appointment of counsel is MOOT [ # 4 ] due to clerk's order filed 11/25/2024. Motion filed by Appellant Fabian Woods, Jr.. [Entered: 11/25/2024 02:27 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Fabian Woods, Jr. failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/25/2024 02:25 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Fabian Woods, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 11/18/2024 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Fabian Woods, Jr.. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 11/18/2024 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Fabian Woods, Jr.. [Entered: 11/18/2024 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Fabian Woods, Jr. on 10/25/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 10/31/2024 03:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
