Curtis Poole v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
CURTIS WEDO POOLE |
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
24-13644 |
November 6, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Curtis Wedo Poole was filed on 10/07/2024. Docket Entry 28. [Entered: 11/07/2024 09:01 AM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Curtis Wedo Poole on 11/05/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 11/07/2024 08:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Curtis Poole v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CURTIS WEDO POOLE | |
Represented By: | Curtis Wedo Poole |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.