Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 24-13785
Filed: November 19, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2025 Filing 10 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 01/03/2025 09:17 AM]
December 27, 2024 Filing 9 Certificate that no transcripts will be ordered filed by Party Raymond Claudio. [Entered: 12/30/2024 02:36 PM]
December 27, 2024 Filing 8 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. [Entered: 12/30/2024 02:34 PM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 12/30/2024 02:31 PM]
December 10, 2024 Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Raymond Claudio. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 12/10/2024 03:06 PM]
December 10, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Raymond Claudio. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 12/10/2024 02:48 PM]
December 10, 2024 Filing 4 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension of time [ # 3 ] filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 12/10/2024 02:46 PM]
December 9, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for extension of time filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 12/10/2024 02:45 PM]
November 20, 2024 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Raymond Claudio was filed on 10/15/2024. Docket Entry 4. [Entered: 11/20/2024 11:18 AM]
November 19, 2024 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Claudio on 11/12/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 11/20/2024 11:11 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Represented By: Raymond Claudio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?