Ray Cox v. Jason Smoak, et al
| RAY COX |
| MINDY VAN ACKERN, KELITA MOORE, CATRINA BURKHALTER-MURRY, JAMES BRAZIER, JASON SMOAK, RHONDA REXROAT, CONNIE HINSON and EVELYN MCGEE |
| 24-14173 |
| December 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Ray Cox. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/24/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 01/28/2025 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Charles Richard Hill, Jr. for James Brazier, Jason Smoak, Catrina Burkhalter-Murry, Mindy Van Ackern, Evelyn McGee, Connie Hinson, Rhonda Rexroat and Kelita Moore. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 01/28/2025 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Charles Richard Hill, Jr. for Appellees Mindy Van Ackern, James Brazier, Catrina Burkhalter-Murry, Connie Hinson, Evelyn McGee, Kelita Moore, Rhonda Rexroat and Jason Smoak. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-14173] (ECF: Charles Hill) [Entered: 01/27/2025 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Attorney Henry F. Sherrod, III for Appellant Ray Cox. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 01/13/2025 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Henry F. Sherrod, III for Appellant Ray Cox. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-14173] (ECF: Henry Sherrod) [Entered: 01/13/2025 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Henry F. Sherrod, III for Appellant Ray Cox. Related cases? No. [24-14173] (ECF: Henry Sherrod) [Entered: 01/13/2025 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Henry F. Sherrod, III for Appellant Ray Cox. No hearings. [24-14173] (ECF: Henry Sherrod) [Entered: 01/13/2025 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Henry F. Sherrod, III for Ray Cox. Related cases? No. [24-14173] (ECF: Henry Sherrod) [Entered: 01/13/2025 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Charles Richard Hill, Jr. for Mindy Van Ackern, James Brazier, Catrina Burkhalter-Murry, Connie Hinson, Evelyn McGee, Kelita Moore, Rhonda Rexroat and Jason Smoak. Related cases? No. [24-14173] (ECF: Charles Hill) [Entered: 01/13/2025 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ray Cox on 12/23/2024. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/17/2025 as to Appellant Ray Cox. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/27/2025 as to Appellee Jason Smoak. [Entered: 12/30/2024 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
