Cecile Jackson v. Secretary of the Air Force
| CECILE JACKSON |
| SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE |
| 25-10038 |
| January 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 30-Day Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Party Cecile Jackson. Appellants brief due on 03/20/2025 as to Appellant Cecile Jackson. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief as to Appellant Cecile Jackson. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 02/11/2025 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Andrew Jabus Grogan for Appellee Secretary of the Air Force. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-10038] (ECF: Andrew Grogan) [Entered: 01/29/2025 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Cecile Jackson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-10038] (ECF: Cecile Jackson) [Entered: 01/27/2025 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Cecile Jackson. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/18/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 01/23/2025 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Cecile Jackson. No hearings. [Entered: 01/23/2025 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Party Cecile Jackson. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [25-10038] (ECF: Cecile Jackson) [Entered: 01/21/2025 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Andrew J. Grogan for Secretary of the Air Force Related cases? No. [25-10038] (ECF: Andrew Grogan) [Entered: 01/15/2025 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Cecile Jackson on 01/06/2025. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/27/2025 as to Appellant Cecile Jackson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/05/2025 as to Appellee Secretary of the Air Force. [Entered: 01/08/2025 09:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cecile Jackson v. Secretary of the Air Force | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CECILE JACKSON | |
| Represented By: | Cecile Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Andrew Jabus Grogan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
