Eddie Scott v. Crystal Blanton, et al
Plaintiff: EDDIE SCOTT
Defendant: CRYSTAL BLANTON and CITY OF OCALA, FLORIDA
Case Number: 25-10214
Filed: January 23, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2025 Filing 7 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant Eddie ScottParty Eddie Scott. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed.. [Entered: 02/20/2025 11:30 AM]
February 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Eddie Scott failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 02/19/2025 01:17 PM]
February 14, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Eddie Scott. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 02/20/2025 11:29 AM]
February 11, 2025 Filing 4 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to dismiss filed by Appellant Eddie Scott. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1. Additionally, the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules for Certificate of Compliance. See FRAP 32(g)(1).. [Entered: 02/12/2025 03:29 PM]
February 5, 2025 Filing 3 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal [ # 2 ] filed by Appellant Eddie ScottParty Eddie Scott. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 02/05/2025 10:27 AM]
February 3, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Eddie Scott. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 02/05/2025 10:25 AM]
January 23, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Eddie Scott on 01/13/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/14/2025 as to Appellant Eddie Scott. [Entered: 01/27/2025 11:02 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eddie Scott v. Crystal Blanton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDDIE SCOTT
Represented By: Eddie Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRYSTAL BLANTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF OCALA, FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?