USA v. James Dorelus
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES DORELUS
Case Number: 25-10296
Filed: January 30, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 10, 2025 USA v. James Dorelus
October 10, 2025 Summary USA v. James Dorelus

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2025 Filing 9 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant James Dorelus. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/08/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 02/27/2025 11:24 AM]
February 27, 2025 Filing 8 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Karl Shires, Filer: James Dorelus, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 10/16/2024 , Sentencing 01/16/2025. [Entered: 02/27/2025 11:18 AM]
February 26, 2025 Filing 7 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Karl Shires, 02/10/2025, James Dorelus, Plea Hearing 10/16/2024 , Sentencing 01/16/2025. [Entered: 02/26/2025 03:06 PM]
February 14, 2025 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: James Dorelus, Court Reporter: Karl Shires, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 10/16/2024 , Sentencing 01/16/2025. [Entered: 02/14/2025 08:23 AM]
February 10, 2025 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Israel Jose Encinosa for Appellant James Dorelus. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-10296] (ECF: Israel Encinosa) [Entered: 02/10/2025 09:28 PM]
February 10, 2025 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Daniel Matzkin for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-10296] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 02/10/2025 02:05 PM]
January 31, 2025 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [25-10296] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 01/31/2025 03:08 PM]
January 30, 2025 Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Israel Jose Encinosa for Appellant James Dorelus. [Entered: 01/30/2025 02:16 PM]
January 30, 2025 Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant James Dorelus on 01/29/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 01/30/2025 02:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. James Dorelus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: Daniel Matzkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES DORELUS
Represented By: Israel Jose Encinosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?