Joe Pyatt, Jr. v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: JOE NATHAN PYATT, JR.
Defendant: AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Case Number: 25-10307
Filed: January 30, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2025 Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to consolidate appeals [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The case you wish to consolidate this appeal with is closed. [Entered: 03/20/2025 10:00 AM]
March 19, 2025 Filing 7 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The district court has denied your request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis but did not assess fees. The Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915, requires that you pay the full filing fee to the District Court. If you are unable to pay the fee in full at this time, you may allow the institution of your confinement to pay the fee in installments from your prisoner account by filing the enclosed Consent Form. This Court granted an extension of time to pay the filing fee until April 1, 2025. The filing fee must be paid or a consent form filed by this date or this appeal will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b). [Entered: 03/19/2025 11:06 AM]
March 17, 2025 Filing 8 MOTION to consolidate appeals 24-14218 and 25-10307 filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 03/20/2025 09:59 AM]
March 14, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 03/19/2025 10:50 AM]
February 28, 2025 Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr. No hearings. [Entered: 02/28/2025 02:51 PM]
February 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Motion for extension to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr. is GRANTED by clerk [ # 3 ]. to 04/01/2025. [Entered: 02/19/2025 04:01 PM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for extension of time to file pay the filing fee to 04/01/2025 filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 02/19/2025 02:14 PM]
February 10, 2025 Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. [Entered: 02/10/2025 04:52 PM]
January 30, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr. on 01/30/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 01/31/2025 11:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joe Pyatt, Jr. v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOE NATHAN PYATT, JR.
Represented By: Joe Nathan Pyatt Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?