USA v. Joe Pyatt, Jr.
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOE NATHAN PYATT, JR. |
| 25-11079 |
| April 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to consolidate appeals 23-11626 and 25-11079 filed by Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Motion is Unopposed. [13] [25-11079] (ECF: Srilekha Jayanthi) [Entered: 05/19/2025 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to proceed pro se filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [12] [Entered: 05/16/2025 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 11 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Srilekha Jayanthi for Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr. Appellants brief due on 06/11/2025 as to Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt Jr. Appendix due 7 days after the brief is filed. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 05/12/2025 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 10 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/12/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/24/2025 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Attorney Srilekha Jayanthi for Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 04/24/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Srilekha Jayanthi for Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [25-11079] (ECF: Srilekha Jayanthi) [Entered: 04/24/2025 07:09 AM] |
| Filing 7 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 04/22/2025 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Srilekha Jayanthi for Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11079] (ECF: Srilekha Jayanthi) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Hector A. Dopico Federal Public Defender Related cases? Yes. [25-11079] (ECF: Hector Dopico) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Srilekha Jayanthi for Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr.. Related cases? Yes. [25-11079] (ECF: Srilekha Jayanthi) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Daniel Matzkin for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11079] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 04/11/2025 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [25-11079] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 04/04/2025 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joe Nathan Pyatt, Jr. on 04/01/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 04/03/2025 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
