U.S. Bank National Association v. Maurice Symonette, et al
| U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |
| MAURICE SYMONETTE and MACK WELLS |
| 25-11153 |
| April 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellants Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells was filed on 08/19/2025. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 08/20/2025 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellants Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells. [Entered: 05/30/2025 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 05/19/2025 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells. No hearings. [Entered: 04/30/2025 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellants Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells was filed on 04/29/2025. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 04/30/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells on 04/07/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/28/2025 as to Appellant Maurice Symonette. [Entered: 04/10/2025 05:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
